Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 5 1400

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E5-2620 v3

6 Cores12 Thrd85 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 1400

4 / 8

7,731

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2620 v3

6 / 12

7,734

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 1400

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $248 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Delivers 146.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 18.5 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $417 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 85W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,731 vs 7,734).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620 v3, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.5 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($417 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌30.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2620 v3 better than Ryzen 5 1400?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2620 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 1400 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2620 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2620 v3 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-2620 v3 comes in 146.7% more expensive on MSRP at $417 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 1400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,731 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 1400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 1400 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 1400

The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.

Xeon E5-2620 v3

The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,734 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 1400 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 1400 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 1400 scores 7,731 against the Xeon E5-2620 v3's 7,734 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+33%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	7,731	7,734

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 1400 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 5 1400 versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — the Ryzen 5 1400 supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2620 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 1400) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2620 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 1400) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2620 v3) — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 1400) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v3).

Feature	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+43%	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	40+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 1400) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2620 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2620 v3 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E5-2620 v3
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 5 1400 was priced at $169, while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 came in at $417. On launch pricing ($169 vs $417), Ryzen 5 1400 was $248 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 1400 delivers 45.7 pts/$ vs 18.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — making the Ryzen 5 1400 the 84.6% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 5 1400	Xeon E5-2620 v3
MSRP	$169-59%	$417
Performance per Dollar	45.7+147%	18.5
Release Date	2017	2014

Search Ryzen 5 1400 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2620 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.