Xeon D-2752TER vs Ryzen 5 6600HS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Xeon D-2752TER

12 / 24

19,074

+0.5%

18,975

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-2752TER

#73

EPYC 4484PX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

111%

#86

Xeon Platinum 8260

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

101%

#87

Xeon D-2752TER

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#97

Xeon Silver 4314

MSRP: $395|Avg: $395

97%

#98

Xeon W-1350

MSRP: $255|Avg: $255

96%

#99

Xeon W-1370P

MSRP: $323|Avg: $323

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon D-2752TER is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.

Insight	Xeon D-2752TER	Ryzen 5 6600HS
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) / 10 nm)	✨ Modern (Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 6600HS ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.

Insight	Xeon D-2752TER	Ryzen 5 6600HS
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon D-2752TER Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 6600HS Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon D-2752TER and Ryzen 5 6600HS

Xeon D-2752TER

The Xeon D-2752TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,074 points. Launch price was $1,061.

Ryzen 5 6600HS

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-2752TER packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon D-2752TER has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon D-2752TER versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS — a 46.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600HS (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon D-2752TER uses the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-2752TER scores 19,074 against the Ryzen 5 6600HS's 18,975 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon D-2752TER. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2752TER vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS.

Feature	Xeon D-2752TER	Ryzen 5 6600HS
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4.5 GHz+61%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.3 GHz+83%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	10 nm	6 nm-40%
Architecture	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)	Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark	19,074	18,975

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2752TER uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.