Xeon E-2124G vs Xeon E5-2637 v3

Intel

Xeon E-2124G

4 Cores4 Thrd71 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E-2124G vs Xeon E5-2637 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2124G vs Xeon E5-2637 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2124G vs Xeon E5-2637 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2124G

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $329 less on MSRP ($667 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
  • Delivers 48.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($667 MSRP vs $996 MSRP).
  • Draws 71W instead of 135W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2637 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (7,218 vs 7,248).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-2637 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($996 MSRP vs $667 MSRP).
  • 90.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 71W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2637 v3 better than Xeon E-2124G?
Yes. Xeon E5-2637 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2637 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2637 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2637 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E-2124G is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2637 v3 comes in 49.3% more expensive on MSRP at $996 MSRP versus $667 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E-2124G is also 48.7% better value on MSRP (10.8 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2124G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E-2124G vs Xeon E5-2637 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E-2124G

The Xeon E-2124G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 71 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,218 points. Launch price was $213.

Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v3

The Xeon E5-2637 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,248 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2124G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2637 v3's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2124G versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v3 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2124G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E-2124G uses the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2124G scores 7,218 against the Xeon E5-2637 v3's 7,248 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2124G vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2637 v3.

FeatureXeon E-2124GXeon E5-2637 v3
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+22%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
7,218
7,248
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2124G uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E-2124GXeon E5-2637 v3
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E-2124G was priced at $667, while the Xeon E5-2637 v3 came in at $996. On launch pricing ($667 vs $996), Xeon E-2124G was $329 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E-2124G delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2637 v3 — making the Xeon E-2124G the 39.2% better value option.

FeatureXeon E-2124GXeon E5-2637 v3
MSRP
$667-33%
$996
Performance per Dollar
10.8+48%
7.3
Release Date
2018
2014

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.