
Xeon E-2126G
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2660 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E-2126G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $1,393 MSRP).
Xeon E5-2660 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,309 less on MSRP ($1,393 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($1,393 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,353 vs 10,437).
- ❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
Xeon E-2126G
2018Xeon E5-2660 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,309 less on MSRP ($1,393 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.4 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($1,393 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $1,393 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,353 vs 10,437).
- ❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2126G better than Xeon E5-2660 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2126G | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2126G | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 67 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E-2126G | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E-2126G | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2126G and Xeon E5-2660 v2

Xeon E-2126G
Xeon E-2126G
The Xeon E-2126G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,437 points. Launch price was $255.

Xeon E5-2660 v2
Xeon E5-2660 v2
The Xeon E5-2660 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,353 points. Launch price was $850.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2126G packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2126G versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v2 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2126G (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E-2126G uses the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2126G scores 10,437 against the Xeon E5-2660 v2's 10,353 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E-2126G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2126G vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v2.
| Feature | Xeon E-2126G | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+50% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+108% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 10,437 | 10,353 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2126G uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2126G | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E-2126G launched at $2702 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2660 v2 debuted at $1393. On MSRP ($2702 vs $1393), the Xeon E5-2660 v2 is $1309 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E-2126G delivers 3.9 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2660 v2 — making the Xeon E5-2660 v2 the 63.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E-2126G | Xeon E5-2660 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2702 | $1393-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.9 | 7.4+90% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












