
Core i7-9700T

Xeon E-2126G
Core i7-9700T vs Xeon E-2126G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700T vs Xeon E-2126G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700T vs Xeon E-2126G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700T
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +17.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $2,379 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- β Delivers 751.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.9 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon E-2126G
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (10,437 vs 10,618).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 32.9 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
- β128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700T better than Xeon E-2126G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700T vs Xeon E-2126G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700T
The Core i7-9700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,618 points. Launch price was $323.

Xeon E-2126G
The Xeon E-2126G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,437 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700T packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2126G offers 6 cores / 6 threads β the Core i7-9700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i7-9700T versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2126G β a 4.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2126G (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700T uses the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2126G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700T scores 10,618 against the Xeon E-2126G's 10,437 β a 1.7% lead for the Core i7-9700T. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-9700T | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+65% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017β2019) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 10,618+2% | 10,437 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-9700T | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700T) / not specified (Xeon E-2126G). The Core i7-9700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E-2126G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700T | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-9700T was priced at $323, while the Xeon E-2126G came in at $2702. On launch pricing ($323 vs $2702), Core i7-9700T was $2379 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700T delivers 32.9 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2126G β making the Core i7-9700T the 157.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700T | Xeon E-2126G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $323-88% | $2702 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.9+744% | 3.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














