Core i5-11300H vs Core i7-9700T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11300H vs Core i7-9700T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11300H vs Core i7-9700T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11300H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700T

2019

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i5-11300H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,618 vs 10,792).
❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Core i5-11300H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-11300H better than Core i7-9700T?

Yes. Core i5-11300H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-11300H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-11300H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-11300H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-9700T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-11300H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700T is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11300H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-11300H vs Core i7-9700T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11300H

The Core i5-11300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,792 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-9700T

The Core i7-9700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,618 points. Launch price was $323.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11300H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-9700T offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11300H versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i7-9700T — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-11300H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-11300H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-9700T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11300H scores 10,792 against the Core i7-9700T's 10,618 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i5-11300H. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11300H vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700T.

Feature	Core i5-11300H	Core i7-9700T
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+2%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+30%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	10,792+2%	10,618

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11300H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-9700T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-11300H	Core i7-9700T
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-11300H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700T). The Core i7-9700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-11300H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700T targets Desktop.