Core i5-11300H vs Xeon E-2176M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11300H vs Xeon E-2176M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11300H vs Xeon E-2176M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11300H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,792 vs 10,848).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2176M, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E-2176M

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2176M better than Core i5-11300H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2176M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11300H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2176M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2176M still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2176M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11300H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-11300H vs Xeon E-2176M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11300H

The Core i5-11300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,792 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2176M

The Xeon E-2176M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,848 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11300H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2176M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E-2176M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11300H versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon E-2176M — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-11300H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E-2176M uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11300H scores 10,792 against the Xeon E-2176M's 10,848 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E-2176M. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11300H vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2176M.

Feature	Core i5-11300H	Xeon E-2176M
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark	10,792	10,848

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11300H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2176M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.