Core i5-11300H vs Xeon E5-4650 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-11300H vs Xeon E5-4650 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-11300H vs Xeon E5-4650 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-11300H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4650 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,792 vs 10,838).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4650 v3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon E5-4650 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4650 v3 better than Core i5-11300H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4650 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-11300H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4650 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4650 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4650 v3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-4650 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-11300H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-11300H vs Xeon E5-4650 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-11300H

The Core i5-11300H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,792 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4650 v3

The Xeon E5-4650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,838 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-11300H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-11300H versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v3 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-11300H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-11300H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11300H scores 10,792 against the Xeon E5-4650 v3's 10,838 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-4650 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11300H vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4650 v3.

Feature	Core i5-11300H	Xeon E5-4650 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+57%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+24%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,792	10,838

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-11300H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.