Core 3 N355
VS
Core i7-9700T

Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-9700T

Intel

Core 3 N355

8 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700T

8 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 3 N355 is positioned at rank #625 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 3 N355

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
97%
#613
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
838%
#614
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
826%
#615
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
758%
#616
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
755%
#617
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
748%
#619
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
722%
#620
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
692%
#621
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
691%
#622
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
673%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700T

#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
116%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
116%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
115%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
115%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
114%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
114%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
113%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
112%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
112%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
112%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
111%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
108%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
108%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
102%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
101%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
100%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
97%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
95%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
92%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
90%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
90%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
86%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
85%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
84%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
79%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
74%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
73%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
72%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
72%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
70%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
68%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core 3 N355 (2025) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 3 N355Core i7-9700T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($276)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Twin Lake (2024−2025) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-9700T (2019) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 3 N355Core i7-9700T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+10%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($276)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 N355 and Core i7-9700T

Intel

Core 3 N355

The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-9700T

The Core i7-9700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,618 points. Launch price was $323.

Processing Power

Both the Core 3 N355 and Core i7-9700T share an identical 8-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i7-9700T — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700T (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-9700T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Core i7-9700T's 10,618 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-9700T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700T.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core i7-9700T
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 8
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
2 GHz+1900%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256K (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Twin Lake (2024−2025)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
10,502
10,618+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-9700T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core i7-9700T
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 N355) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700T). The Core i7-9700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core 3 N355 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700T targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core i7-9700T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 3 N355 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700T debuted at $323. At current prices ($300 vs $276), the Core i7-9700T is $24 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 N355 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 38.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700T — making the Core i7-9700T the 9.4% better value option.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core i7-9700T
MSRP
$300-7%
$323
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$276-8%
Performance per Dollar
35.0
38.5+10%
Release Date
2025
2019