Core 3 N355
VS
Core 5 120UL

Core 3 N355 vs Core 5 120UL

Intel

Core 3 N355

8 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core 5 120UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core 3 N355 is positioned at rank #625 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 3 N355

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
97%
#613
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
838%
#614
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
826%
#615
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
758%
#616
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
755%
#617
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
748%
#619
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
722%
#620
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
692%
#621
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
691%
#622
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
673%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 5 120UL

#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
115%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
114%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
114%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
114%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
114%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
114%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
112%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
112%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
111%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
110%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
110%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
110%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
109%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
106%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
106%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
100%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
100%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
98%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
95%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
91%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
88%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
88%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
85%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
84%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
83%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
78%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
73%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
72%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
71%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 5 120UL delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 3 N355 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 3 N355Core 5 120UL
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($270)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Twin Lake (2024−2025) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-PS (2024) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core 5 120UL leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 10% cheaper ($270 vs $300) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 3 N355Core 5 120UL
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+12%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($270)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 N355 and Core 5 120UL

Intel

Core 3 N355

The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 5 120UL

The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core 5 120UL offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 0.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core 5 120UL uses Raptor Lake-PS (2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Core 5 120UL's 10,558 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 5 120UL. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core 5 120UL
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
10 / 12+25%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
1.3 GHz+1200%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Twin Lake (2024−2025)
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
PassMark
10,502
10,558
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 5 120UL uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core 5 120UL
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 3 N355 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Core 5 120UL debuted at $277. At current prices ($300 vs $270), the Core 5 120UL is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 N355 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 39.1 pts/$ for the Core 5 120UL — making the Core 5 120UL the 11.1% better value option.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core 5 120UL
MSRP
$300
$277-8%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$270-10%
Performance per Dollar
35.0
39.1+12%
Release Date
2025
2024