
Core 3 N355

Core 5 120UL
Core 3 N355 vs Core 5 120UL Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 3 N355 vs Core 5 120UL FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 3 N355 vs Core 5 120UL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 3 N355
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 120UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,502 vs 10,558).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $277 MSRP).
Core 5 120UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $23 less on MSRP ($277 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 35.0 PassMark/$ ($277 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120UL better than Core 3 N355?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 N355 vs Core 5 120UL Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 N355
The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 5 120UL
The Core 5 120UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,558 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core 5 120UL offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Core 5 120UL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core 5 120UL — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Core 5 120UL (base: 0.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core 5 120UL uses Raptor Lake-PS (2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Core 5 120UL's 10,558 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 5 120UL. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 120UL.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core 5 120UL |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 10 / 12+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz+1200% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Twin Lake (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| PassMark | 10,502 | 10,558 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 5 120UL uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core 5 120UL |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 3 N355 was priced at $300, while the Core 5 120UL came in at $277. On launch pricing ($300 vs $277), Core 5 120UL was $23 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 N355 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 38.1 pts/$ for the Core 5 120UL — making the Core 5 120UL the 8.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core 5 120UL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $277-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0 | 38.1+9% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














