Core 3 N355 vs Xeon D-1567

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 N355 vs Xeon D-1567 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 N355 vs Xeon D-1567: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 N355

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Costs $2,402 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Delivers 805.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.0 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1567 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1567, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon D-1567

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,447 vs 10,502).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 35.0 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1667 with DDR4, while Core 3 N355 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 N355 better than Xeon D-1567?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1567 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 3 N355 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 3 N355 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 3 N355 is the better buy right now. Core 3 N355 comes in $2,402 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon D-1567 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 805.4% better value on MSRP (35.0 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 N355 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1667, 300% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1.5 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 3 N355 vs Xeon D-1567 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 N355

The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon D-1567

The Xeon D-1567 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,447 points. Launch price was $1,069.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1567 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-1567 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 2.7 GHz on the Xeon D-1567 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core 3 N355 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon D-1567 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Xeon D-1567's 10,447 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 3 N355. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1567.

Feature	Core 3 N355	Xeon D-1567
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+44%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	2.1 GHz+2000%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+300%	1.5 MB (per core)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Twin Lake (2024−2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	10,502	10,447

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1567 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 3 N355	Xeon D-1567
Socket	FCBGA1264	FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 3 N355 was priced at $300, while the Xeon D-1567 came in at $2702. On launch pricing ($300 vs $2702), Core 3 N355 was $2402 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 3 N355 delivers 35.0 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1567 — making the Core 3 N355 the 160.2% better value option.

Feature	Core 3 N355	Xeon D-1567
MSRP	$300-89%	$2702
Performance per Dollar	35.0+797%	3.9
Release Date	2025	2016

Search Core 3 N355 on Amazon

Search Xeon D-1567 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.