Core 3 N355 vs Xeon E5-4620 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 N355 vs Xeon E5-4620 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 N355 vs Xeon E5-4620 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 N355

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 105W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4620 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,502 vs 10,525).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4620 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4620 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4620 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+316.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 105W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 3 N355 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4620 v3 better than Core 3 N355?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4620 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core 3 N355 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4620 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4620 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 316.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-4620 v3 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-4620 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 3 N355 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 13.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 N355 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 3 N355 vs Xeon E5-4620 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 N355

The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-4620 v3

The Xeon E5-4620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,525 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-4620 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4620 v3 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core 3 N355 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Xeon E5-4620 v3's 10,525 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-4620 v3. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4620 v3.

Feature	Core 3 N355	Xeon E5-4620 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+50%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	2 GHz+1900%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+317%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Twin Lake (2024−2025)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,502	10,525

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.