
Core 3 N355

Core i7-1195G7
Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-1195G7 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-1195G7 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-1195G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 3 N355
2025Why buy it
- β +0.3% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1195G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i7-1195G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-1195G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-1195G7
2021Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +23.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core 3 N355 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (10,472 vs 10,502).
- β86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
- βOlder platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core 3 N355 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 3 N355 better than Core i7-1195G7?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-1195G7 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 N355
The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-1195G7
The Core i7-1195G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020β2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,472 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-1195G7 offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core 3 N355 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-1195G7 β a 24.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-1195G7 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024β2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-1195G7 uses Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020β2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Core i7-1195G7's 10,472 β a 0.3% lead for the Core 3 N355. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1195G7.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i7-1195G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+2800% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Twin Lake (2024β2025) | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020β2021) |
| PassMark | 10,502 | 10,472 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 6,806 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,930 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 5,426 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-1195G7 uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i7-1195G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1449 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 3 N355) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1195G7). The Core i7-1195G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Core 3 N355 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1195G7 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-1195G7 rivals Ryzen 7 5700U.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i7-1195G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













