Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-9750H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-9750H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-9750H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 3 N355

2025

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9750H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,502 vs 10,611).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i7-9750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-9750H

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 3 N355 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9750H better than Core 3 N355?

Yes. Core i7-9750H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9750H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9750H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9750H is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-9750H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 3 N355 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 17.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 3 N355 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core 3 N355 vs Core i7-9750H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 3 N355

The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-9750H

The Core i7-9750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,611 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-9750H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 3 N355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750H — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9750H (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-9750H uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Core i7-9750H's 10,611 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-9750H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9750H.

Feature	Core 3 N355	Core i7-9750H
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4.5 GHz+15%
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+2500%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Twin Lake (2024−2025)	Coffee Lake-HR (2019)
PassMark	10,502	10,611+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-9750H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.