Xeon E-2186M vs Xeon E5-2628L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2186M vs Xeon E5-2628L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2186M vs Xeon E5-2628L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2186M

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).

Xeon E5-2628L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,079 vs 11,285).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2186M better than Xeon E5-2628L v4?

Yes. Xeon E-2186M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2186M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2186M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2186M still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2186M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2186M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2186M vs Xeon E5-2628L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2186M

The Xeon E-2186M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,285 points. Launch price was $623.

Xeon E5-2628L v4

The Xeon E5-2628L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,079 points. Launch price was $1,364.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2186M packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2628L v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2628L v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2186M versus 1.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2628L v4 — a 86.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2186M. The Xeon E-2186M uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2628L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2186M scores 11,285 against the Xeon E5-2628L v4's 11,079 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon E-2186M. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2186M vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2628L v4.

Feature	Xeon E-2186M	Xeon E5-2628L v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+153%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	30 MB+150%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	3 MB+1100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	11,285+2%	11,079