Xeon E-2186M vs Xeon E5-2630 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2186M vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2186M vs Xeon E5-2630 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2186M

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 85W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,285 vs 11,434).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon E5-2630 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,171 MSRP, while Xeon E-2186M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌88.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2186M better than Xeon E5-2630 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E-2186M is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2630 v4 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2630 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2630 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2186M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2630 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2186M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,171 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2630 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2630 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2186M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E-2186M vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2186M

The Xeon E-2186M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,285 points. Launch price was $623.

Xeon E5-2630 v4

The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,434 points. Launch price was $667.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2186M packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2186M versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — a 43% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2186M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E-2186M uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2186M scores 11,285 against the Xeon E5-2630 v4's 11,434 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2630 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2186M vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630 v4.

Feature	Xeon E-2186M	Xeon E5-2630 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+55%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+32%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB+108%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2.5 MB+900%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	11,285	11,434+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,032
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,368

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2186M uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E-2186M	Xeon E5-2630 v4
Socket	BGA1440	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4 1600/1866/2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2186M) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E5-2630 v4). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v4 targets Workstation / Server.