Xeon E-2436 vs Xeon W-11955M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2436 vs Xeon W-11955M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2436 vs Xeon W-11955M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2436

2023

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Xeon W-11955M

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,702 vs 21,708).
❌Launch MSRP is still $623 MSRP, while Xeon E-2436 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2436 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2436 better than Xeon W-11955M?

Yes. Xeon E-2436 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2436 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2436 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E-2436 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $623 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-11955M only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2436 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1787, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon E-2436 vs Xeon W-11955M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2436

The Xeon E-2436 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 21,708 points. Launch price was $331.

Xeon W-11955M

The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2436 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-11955M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-11955M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2436 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2436 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2436 scores 21,708 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E-2436. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2436 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.

Feature	Xeon E-2436	Xeon W-11955M
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+38%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm SuperFin
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark	21,708	21,702

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2436 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.