Xeon E3-1235L v5
VS
FX-8320E

Xeon E3-1235L v5 vs FX-8320E

Intel

Xeon E3-1235L v5

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3 GHz2015
VS
AMD

FX-8320E

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1235L v5 is positioned at rank 555 and the FX-8320E is on rank 555, so the FX-8320E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1235L v5

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8290%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1565%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1391%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1074%
#335
Xeon Gold 6430
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1850
99%
#336
Xeon Gold 6421N
MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427
99%
#337
EPYC 7F72
MSRP: $2131|Avg: $2131
99%
#338
Xeon W-2265
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $663
99%
#339
Xeon w7-3555
MSRP: $2749|Avg: $2199
98%
#340
Xeon w7-3445
MSRP: $1989|Avg: $2596
98%
#341
EPYC 9275F
MSRP: $3439|Avg: $3439
98%
#342
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
MSRP: $3899|Avg: $3971.7
98%
#343
EPYC 7543P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $115
97%
#344
EPYC 9455P
MSRP: $4819|Avg: $4366
97%
#345
EPYC 9274F
MSRP: $3060|Avg: $2490
96%
#346
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
MSRP: $2607|Avg: $389
96%
#555
Xeon E3-1235L v5
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8320E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9239%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8730%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6338%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1910%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1513%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1323%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
758%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
748%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
681%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
681%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
673%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
655%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
646%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
643%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
638%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
97%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
98%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
97%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
96%
#555
FX-8320E
MSRP: $147|Avg: $60
100%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
98%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
97%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
97%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
97%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
96%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
95%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
95%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1235L v5 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E3-1235L v5FX-8320E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-DT (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8320E ($60), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($60 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E3-1235L v5FX-8320E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1235L v5 and FX-8320E

Intel

Xeon E3-1235L v5

The Xeon E3-1235L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,013 points. Launch price was $250.

AMD

FX-8320E

The FX-8320E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,960 points. Launch price was $147.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1235L v5 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8320E offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8320E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1235L v5 versus 4 GHz on the FX-8320E — a 28.6% clock advantage for the FX-8320E (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1235L v5 uses the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8320E uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1235L v5 scores 5,013 against the FX-8320E's 4,960 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1235L v5.

FeatureXeon E3-1235L v5FX-8320E
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
8192 kB+3100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake-DT (2015)
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
5,013+1%
4,960
Geekbench 6 Single
439
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,734
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1235L v5 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8320E uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1235L v5FX-8320E
Socket
LGA1151
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1235L v5) / AMD-V (FX-8320E).

FeatureXeon E3-1235L v5FX-8320E
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V