Xeon E3-1240 v3
VS
Core i7-6700T

Xeon E3-1240 v3 vs Core i7-6700T

Intel

Xeon E3-1240 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i7-6700T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1240 v3 is positioned at rank 419 and the Core i7-6700T is on rank 725, so the Xeon E3-1240 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1240 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5936%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
99%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1121%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
996%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
769%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
100%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $1130
99%
#281
EPYC 7402P
MSRP: $1280|Avg: $1090
98%
#419
Xeon E3-1240 v3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#425
Xeon E5-4620 v2
MSRP: $273|Avg: $30
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6700T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13506%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12762%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9266%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2791%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2211%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1934%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1108%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1093%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
996%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
995%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
984%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
958%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
944%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
941%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
932%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
100%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
100%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
100%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
99%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
99%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
99%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
98%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
98%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
98%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
97%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
97%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
97%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1240 v3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E3-1240 v3Core i7-6700T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-6700T ($60), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($60 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E3-1240 v3Core i7-6700T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i7-6700T

Intel

Xeon E3-1240 v3

The Xeon E3-1240 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,001 points. Launch price was $300.

Intel

Core i7-6700T

The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Core i7-6700T share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v3 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1240 v3 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E3-1240 v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6700T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240 v3 scores 7,001 against the Core i7-6700T's 6,994 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v3. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v3 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700T.

FeatureXeon E3-1240 v3Core i7-6700T
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+6%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+21%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
7,001
6,994
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1240 v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6700T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1240 v3Core i7-6700T
Socket
LGA1150
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0