Xeon E3-1240 v5
VS
Core i7-3930K

Xeon E3-1240 v5 vs Core i7-3930K

Intel

Xeon E3-1240 v5

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i7-3930K

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is positioned at rank 353 and the Core i7-3930K is on rank 917, so the Xeon E3-1240 v5 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1240 v5

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5033%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
950%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
844%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
652%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
99%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
99%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
98%
#353
Xeon E3-1240 v5
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#362
Xeon E5-2667 v2
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3930K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
22155%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20934%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15200%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4579%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3627%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3173%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1817%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1794%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1633%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1633%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1615%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1571%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1549%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1543%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1529%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
96%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
100%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
100%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
100%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
100%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
99%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
99%
#923
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
98%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
97%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
97%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
97%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
97%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
96%
#932
Pentium E6800
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E3-1240 v5Core i7-3930K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-DT (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3930K ($150), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($150 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E3-1240 v5Core i7-3930K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Core i7-3930K

Intel

Xeon E3-1240 v5

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151, LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 8,258 points. Launch price was $282.

Intel

Core i7-3930K

The Core i7-3930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,204 points. Launch price was $611.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-3930K offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-3930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v5 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3930K — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1240 v5 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E3-1240 v5 uses the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-3930K uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240 v5 scores 8,258 against the Core i7-3930K's 8,204 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v5. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v5 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-3930K.

FeatureXeon E3-1240 v5Core i7-3930K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+3%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+9%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake-DT (2015)
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
PassMark
8,258
8,204
Geekbench 6 Single
731
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 uses the LGA1151, LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3930K uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1240 v5Core i7-3930K
Socket
LGA1151, LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v5) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3930K). Primary use case: Core i7-3930K targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3930K rivals FX-8350.

FeatureXeon E3-1240 v5Core i7-3930K
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
HEDT Desktop