
Xeon E3-1245 v3

Xeon W3680
Xeon E3-1245 v3 vs Xeon W3680 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E3-1245 v3 vs Xeon W3680 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E3-1245 v3 vs Xeon W3680: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E3-1245 v3
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $104 less on MSRP ($490 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($490 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 84W instead of 130W, a 46W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics P4600, while Xeon W3680 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Xeon W3680
2010Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,025 vs 7,036).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $490 MSRP).
- ❌54.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 84W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1245 v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1245 v3 better than Xeon W3680?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1245 v3 vs Xeon W3680 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1245 v3
The Xeon E3-1245 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,036 points. Launch price was $320.

Xeon W3680
The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1245 v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W3680 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v3 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1245 v3 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The Xeon E3-1245 v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3680 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1245 v3 scores 7,036 against the Xeon W3680's 7,025 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E3-1245 v3. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1245 v3 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1245 v3 | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+6% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+2% | 3.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 12 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 7,036 | 7,025 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,203 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,820 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1245 v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3680 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1245 v3 | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1245 v3) / not specified (Xeon W3680). The Xeon E3-1245 v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the Xeon W3680 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1245 v3 | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics P4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E3-1245 v3 was priced at $490, while the Xeon W3680 came in at $594. On launch pricing ($490 vs $594), Xeon E3-1245 v3 was $104 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1245 v3 delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W3680 — making the Xeon E3-1245 v3 the 19.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1245 v3 | Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $490-18% | $594 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4+22% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














