Xeon E3-1271 v3 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2

Intel

Xeon E3-1271 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2440 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E3-1271 v3 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1271 v3 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1271 v3 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1271 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2440 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $727 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,473 vs 7,504).
  • 18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1271 v3 better than Xeon E5-2440 v2?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is ahead with a 13.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1271 v3 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2440 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1271 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E3-1271 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1271 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $727 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2440 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 13.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1271 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E3-1271 v3 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E3-1271 v3

The Xeon E3-1271 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,504 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E5-2440 v2

The Xeon E5-2440 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,473 points. Launch price was $400.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1271 v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2440 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1271 v3 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 v2 — a 50% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1271 v3 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-2440 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1271 v3 scores 7,504 against the Xeon E5-2440 v2's 7,473 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1271 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E3-1271 v3 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440 v2.

FeatureXeon E3-1271 v3Xeon E5-2440 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+67%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+89%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark
7,504
7,473
Geekbench 6 Single
1,308
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,328
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1271 v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1271 v3Xeon E5-2440 v2
Socket
LGA1150
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E3-1271 v3) / not specified (Xeon E5-2440 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E3-1271 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1271 v3 rivals Core i7-4770.

FeatureXeon E3-1271 v3Xeon E5-2440 v2
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server