Xeon E3-1280 v3 vs Xeon Phi 7210
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Xeon Phi 7210
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1280 v3 is positioned at rank 496 and the Xeon Phi 7210 is on rank 999, so the Xeon E3-1280 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1280 v3
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Phi 7210
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1280 v3 | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($44) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Knights Landing (2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1280 v3 | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+238%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($44) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Xeon Phi 7210
Xeon E3-1280 v3
The Xeon E3-1280 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 82 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,252 points. Launch price was $800.
Xeon Phi 7210
The Xeon Phi 7210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 64 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 215 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,306 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1280 v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7210 offers 64 cores / 256 threads — the Xeon Phi 7210 has 60 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 v3 versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7210 — a 90.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1280 v3 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Xeon E3-1280 v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1280 v3 scores 7,252 against the Xeon Phi 7210's 7,306 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Phi 7210. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1280 v3 vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7210.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1280 v3 | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 64 / 256+1500% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+167% | 1.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+177% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 0 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| PassMark | 7,252 | 7,306 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1280 v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1280 v3 | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1280 v3 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Xeon Phi 7210 debuted at $1881. At current prices ($44 vs $150), the Xeon E3-1280 v3 is $106 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1280 v3 delivers 164.8 pts/$ vs 48.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Phi 7210 — making the Xeon E3-1280 v3 the 108.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1280 v3 | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-87% | $1881 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $44-71% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 164.8+238% | 48.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Xeon Phi 7210
