Xeon E3-1285L v3 vs Xeon E5-2430 v2

Intel

Xeon E3-1285L v3

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2430 v2

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E3-1285L v3 vs Xeon E5-2430 v2 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1285L v3 vs Xeon E5-2430 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1285L v3 vs Xeon E5-2430 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1285L v3

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2430 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-2430 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,859 vs 6,874).
  • 23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1285L v3 better than Xeon E5-2430 v2?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2430 v2 is ahead with a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1285L v3 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2430 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1285L v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E3-1285L v3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E3-1285L v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2430 v2 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon E3-1285L v3 vs Xeon E5-2430 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E3-1285L v3

The Xeon E3-1285L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,874 points. Launch price was $809.

Intel

Xeon E5-2430 v2

The Xeon E5-2430 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,859 points. Launch price was $311.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1285L v3 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2430 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2430 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285L v3 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430 v2 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285L v3 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon E3-1285L v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2430 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1285L v3 scores 6,874 against the Xeon E5-2430 v2's 6,859 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E3-1285L v3. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285L v3 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2430 v2.

FeatureXeon E3-1285L v3Xeon E5-2430 v2
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+30%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+24%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
15 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark
6,874
6,859
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1285L v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2430 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1285L v3Xeon E5-2430 v2
Socket
LGA1150
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0