Xeon E3-1290
VS
Xeon X5687

Xeon E3-1290 vs Xeon X5687

Intel

Xeon E3-1290

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon X5687

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.86 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1290 is positioned at rank 525 and the Xeon X5687 is on rank 877, so the Xeon E3-1290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1290

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7655%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1445%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1284%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
992%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
98%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
98%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
97%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
97%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
96%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
95%
#525
Xeon E3-1290
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#535
Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $27
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5687

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
21293%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4020%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3572%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2759%
#494
EPYC 9184X
MSRP: $4928|Avg: $3750
99%
#495
Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP: $9359|Avg: $9359
98%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
97%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
97%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
96%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
95%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
95%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
94%
#877
Xeon X5687
MSRP: $552|Avg: $189
100%
#878
Xeon E5-2630 v4
MSRP: $1171|Avg: $130
100%
#881
Xeon E5-2430L
MSRP: $551|Avg: $250
99%
#886
Xeon X3460
MSRP: $316|Avg: $25
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Xeon E3-1290 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Xeon X5687 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightXeon E3-1290Xeon X5687
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightXeon E3-1290Xeon X5687
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($189)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1290 and Xeon X5687

Intel

Xeon E3-1290

The Xeon E3-1290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,429 points. Launch price was $885.

Intel

Xeon X5687

The Xeon X5687 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,386 points. Launch price was $121.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E3-1290 and Xeon X5687 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1290 versus 3.86 GHz on the Xeon X5687 — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1290 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E3-1290 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5687 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1290 scores 5,429 against the Xeon X5687's 5,386 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1290. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1290 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5687.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Xeon X5687
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+4%
3.86 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
5,429
5,386
Geekbench 6 Single
1,643
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,386
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1290 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5687 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Xeon X5687
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
288 GB
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
36
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1290) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5687). Primary use case: Xeon X5687 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Xeon X5687
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server