FX-8320
VS
Xeon E3-1290

FX-8320 vs Xeon E3-1290

AMD

FX-8320

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1290

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8320 is positioned at rank 566 and the Xeon E3-1290 is on rank 525, so the Xeon E3-1290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9627%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9096%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6605%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1990%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1576%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1379%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
790%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
779%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
710%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
710%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
702%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
683%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
673%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
670%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
664%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
100%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
99%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
99%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
99%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
99%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
99%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
98%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
98%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
97%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
97%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
97%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1290

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7655%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1445%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1284%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
992%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
98%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
98%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
97%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
97%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
96%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
95%
#525
Xeon E3-1290
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#535
Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $27
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1290 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-8320Xeon E3-1290
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8320 ($50), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($50 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-8320Xeon E3-1290
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8320 and Xeon E3-1290

AMD

FX-8320

The FX-8320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,472 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E3-1290

The Xeon E3-1290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,429 points. Launch price was $885.

Processing Power

The FX-8320 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1290 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8320 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1290 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The FX-8320 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1290 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320 scores 5,472 against the Xeon E3-1290's 5,429 — a 0.8% lead for the FX-8320.

FeatureFX-8320Xeon E3-1290
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
5,472
5,429
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,500
Geekbench 6 Single
458
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,791
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1290 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-8320Xeon E3-1290
Socket
AM3+
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (FX-8320) / not specified (Xeon E3-1290). Primary use case: FX-8320 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: FX-8320 rivals Core i5-3570.

FeatureFX-8320Xeon E3-1290
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Productivity