
Core i5-8365UE

FX-8320
Core i5-8365UE vs FX-8320 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-8365UE vs FX-8320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-8365UE vs FX-8320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-8365UE
2019Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (5,435 vs 5,472).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($297 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8320.
FX-8320
2012Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $128 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- β Delivers 76.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 18.3 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-8365UE.
Trade-offs
- β733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-8320 better than Core i5-8365UE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8365UE vs FX-8320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8365UE
The Core i5-8365UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,435 points. Launch price was $297.

FX-8320
The FX-8320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012β2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,472 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-8365UE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8320 offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the FX-8320 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-8365UE versus 4 GHz on the FX-8320 β a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-8365UE (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-8365UE uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8320 uses Vishera (2012β2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8365UE scores 5,435 against the FX-8320's 5,472 β a 0.7% lead for the FX-8320.
| Feature | Core i5-8365UE | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+2% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz+119% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Whiskey Lake-U (2018β2019) | Vishera (2012β2015) |
| PassMark | 5,435 | 5,472 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 4,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 458 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 1,791 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8365UE uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-8365UE | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-8365UE) / AMD-V (FX-8320). Primary use case: FX-8320 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: FX-8320 rivals Core i5-3570.
| Feature | Core i5-8365UE | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Productivity |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-8365UE was priced at $297, while the FX-8320 came in at $169. On launch pricing ($297 vs $169), FX-8320 was $128 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-8365UE delivers 18.3 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the FX-8320 β making the FX-8320 the 55.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-8365UE | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $297 | $169-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.3 | 32.4+77% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















