Core i5-4670 vs Core i5-8365UE

Intel

Core i5-4670

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i5-8365UE

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-4670

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $84 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
  • Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 18.3 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Core i5-8365UE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 460% higher power demand at 84W vs 15W.

Core i5-8365UE

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 84W, a 69W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (5,435 vs 5,491).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($297 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4670 better than Core i5-8365UE?
Yes. Core i5-4670 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4670 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-4670 is the smarter buy today. Core i5-4670 is $84 cheaper on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $297 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.9% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 18.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8365UE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-4670Core i5-8365UE
1080p
low137 FPS136 FPS
medium137 FPS134 FPS
high112 FPS108 FPS
ultra89 FPS84 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS136 FPS
medium118 FPS111 FPS
high93 FPS88 FPS
ultra74 FPS68 FPS
4K
low66 FPS65 FPS
medium57 FPS55 FPS
high45 FPS43 FPS
ultra35 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-4670Core i5-8365UE
1080p
low137 FPS125 FPS
medium137 FPS110 FPS
high137 FPS103 FPS
ultra118 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS112 FPS
medium137 FPS98 FPS
high126 FPS92 FPS
ultra104 FPS80 FPS
4K
low124 FPS88 FPS
medium111 FPS79 FPS
high92 FPS68 FPS
ultra70 FPS57 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-4670Core i5-8365UE
1080p
low137 FPS136 FPS
medium137 FPS136 FPS
high137 FPS136 FPS
ultra137 FPS136 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS136 FPS
medium137 FPS136 FPS
high137 FPS136 FPS
ultra137 FPS136 FPS
4K
low137 FPS136 FPS
medium137 FPS136 FPS
high137 FPS136 FPS
ultra137 FPS136 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-4670Core i5-8365UE
1080p
low137 FPS136 FPS
medium137 FPS136 FPS
high137 FPS136 FPS
ultra137 FPS136 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS136 FPS
medium137 FPS136 FPS
high137 FPS136 FPS
ultra137 FPS136 FPS
4K
low137 FPS136 FPS
medium137 FPS136 FPS
high137 FPS136 FPS
ultra137 FPS136 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4670 and Core i5-8365UE

Intel

Core i5-4670

The Core i5-4670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,491 points. Launch price was $360.

Intel

Core i5-8365UE

The Core i5-8365UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,435 points. Launch price was $297.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i5-8365UE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-8365UE — a 7.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-8365UE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i5-4670 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-8365UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670 scores 5,491 against the Core i5-8365UE's 5,435 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-4670. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8365UE.

FeatureCore i5-4670Core i5-8365UE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz+8%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+112%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
5,491+1%
5,435
Geekbench 6 Single
1,169
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,279
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8365UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-4670Core i5-8365UE
Socket
LGA1150
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670) / not specified (Core i5-8365UE). The Core i5-4670 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-8365UE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670 targets Mid-Range Desktop.

FeatureCore i5-4670Core i5-8365UE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mid-Range Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-4670 launched at $213 MSRP, while the Core i5-8365UE debuted at $297. On MSRP ($213 vs $297), the Core i5-4670 is $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 18.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-8365UE — making the Core i5-4670 the 33.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-4670Core i5-8365UE
MSRP
$213-28%
$297
Performance per Dollar
25.8+41%
18.3
Release Date
2013
2019