
Core i5-4670
Popular choices:

Core i5-8365UE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-4670
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 18.3 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Core i5-8365UE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌460% higher power demand at 84W vs 15W.
Core i5-8365UE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 84W, a 69W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,435 vs 5,491).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($297 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670.
Core i5-4670
2013Core i5-8365UE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 18.3 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Core i5-8365UE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 84W, a 69W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌460% higher power demand at 84W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,435 vs 5,491).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($297 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-4670 better than Core i5-8365UE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-4670 | Core i5-8365UE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-4670 | Core i5-8365UE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-4670 | Core i5-8365UE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-4670 | Core i5-8365UE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 136 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4670 and Core i5-8365UE

Core i5-4670
Core i5-4670
The Core i5-4670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,491 points. Launch price was $360.

Core i5-8365UE
Core i5-8365UE
The Core i5-8365UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,435 points. Launch price was $297.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4670 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i5-8365UE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-8365UE — a 7.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-8365UE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i5-4670 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-8365UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670 scores 5,491 against the Core i5-8365UE's 5,435 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-4670. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8365UE.
| Feature | Core i5-4670 | Core i5-8365UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+112% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 5,491+1% | 5,435 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,169 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,279 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4670 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8365UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4670 | Core i5-8365UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FCBGA1528 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670) / not specified (Core i5-8365UE). The Core i5-4670 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i5-8365UE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670 targets Mid-Range Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-4670 | Core i5-8365UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mid-Range Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-4670 launched at $213 MSRP, while the Core i5-8365UE debuted at $297. On MSRP ($213 vs $297), the Core i5-4670 is $84 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 18.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-8365UE — making the Core i5-4670 the 33.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-4670 | Core i5-8365UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $213-28% | $297 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8+41% | 18.3 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













