Core i5-4670 vs Ryzen 3 2300U

Core i5-4670 vs Ryzen 3 2300U Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4670

4 / 4

5,491

+0.1%

5,484

0.0%

Athlon X4 830

Athlon X4 880K

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8140

Ryzen 7 5700

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670 vs Ryzen 3 2300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670 vs Ryzen 3 2300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Ryzen 3 2300U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 2300U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 2300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌460% higher power demand at 84W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 2300U

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 84W, a 69W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,484 vs 5,491).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4670 better than Ryzen 3 2300U?

Yes. Core i5-4670 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4670 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4670 is the better buy right now. Core i5-4670 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $213 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 2300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4670 vs Ryzen 3 2300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670

The Core i5-4670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,491 points. Launch price was $360.

Ryzen 3 2300U

The Ryzen 3 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,484 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4670 and Ryzen 3 2300U share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300U — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-4670 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2300U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670 scores 5,491 against the Ryzen 3 2300U's 5,484 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4670. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300U.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Ryzen 3 2300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+12%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+70%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	5,491	5,484
Geekbench 6 Single	1,169	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,279	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Ryzen 3 2300U
Socket	LGA1150	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670) / not specified (Ryzen 3 2300U). The Core i5-4670 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Ryzen 3 2300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670 targets Mid-Range Desktop.