PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670 vs Core i5-7400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670 vs Core i5-7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (3,279 vs 3,517).
❌29.2% higher power demand at 84W vs 65W.

Core i5-7400

2017

Why buy it

✅+7.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 65W instead of 84W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.6 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7400 better than Core i5-4670?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4670 is ahead with a 4.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7400 pulls ahead with 7.3% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7400 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-7400 comes in 38.0% more expensive on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you 7.3% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i5-4670 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 38.4% better value on paper (25.8 vs 18.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4670 vs Core i5-7400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670

The Core i5-4670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,491 points. Launch price was $360.

Core i5-7400

The Core i5-7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,477 points. Launch price was $182.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4670 and Core i5-7400 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7400 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-4670 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-7400 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670 scores 5,491 against the Core i5-7400's 5,477 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4670. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,169 vs 1,215, a 3.9% lead for the Core i5-7400 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,279 vs 3,517 (7% advantage for the Core i5-7400). L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Core i5-7400
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+9%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,491	5,477
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	3,359
Geekbench 6 Single	1,169	1,215+4%
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,279	3,517+7%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-7400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4670 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7400 — the Core i5-7400 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7400 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4670) and 100-series,200-series (Core i5-7400).

Feature	Core i5-4670	Core i5-7400
Socket	LGA1150	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7400). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4670) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7400) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670 targets Mid-Range Desktop, Core i5-7400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-7400 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Core i5-7400
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4600	HD Graphics 630
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Mid-Range Desktop	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4670 was priced at $213, while the Core i5-7400 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($213 vs $294), Core i5-4670 was $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 18.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-7400 — making the Core i5-4670 the 32.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Core i5-7400
MSRP	$213-28%	$294
Performance per Dollar	25.8+39%	18.6
Release Date	2013	2017

Search Core i5-4670 on Amazon

Search Core i5-7400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.