PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670 vs Core i7-6822EQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670 vs Core i7-6822EQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670

2013

Why buy it

✅+17.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 36.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i7-6822EQ.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6822EQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌236% higher power demand at 84W vs 25W.

Core i7-6822EQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 84W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,796 vs 3,279).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.9 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6822EQ better than Core i5-4670?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-6822EQ is ahead with a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670 pulls ahead with 17.3% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i7-6822EQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6822EQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-6822EQ comes in 38.0% more expensive on MSRP at $294 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-4670 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 36.6% better value on paper (25.8 vs 18.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6822EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4670 vs Core i7-6822EQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670

The Core i5-4670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,491 points. Launch price was $360.

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4670 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-6822EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670 versus 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ — a 62.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670. The Core i5-4670 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6822EQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670 scores 5,491 against the Core i7-6822EQ's 5,550 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-6822EQ. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,169 vs 684, a 52.3% lead for the Core i5-4670 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,279 vs 2,796 (15.9% advantage for the Core i5-4670). L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670 vs 8 MB on the Core i7-6822EQ.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Core i7-6822EQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+90%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	5,491	5,550+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,169+71%	684
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,279+17%	2,796

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4670 versus DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i7-6822EQ — the Core i7-6822EQ supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-6822EQ supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i5-4670) and Skylake-H Platform (Core i7-6822EQ).

Feature	Core i5-4670	Core i7-6822EQ
Socket	LGA1150	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4670) and Intel HD Graphics 530 (Core i7-6822EQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670 targets Mid-Range Desktop, Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Core i7-6822EQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4600	Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	Mid-Range Desktop	Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4670 was priced at $213, while the Core i7-6822EQ came in at $294. On launch pricing ($213 vs $294), Core i5-4670 was $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-6822EQ — making the Core i5-4670 the 30.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP	$213-28%	$294
Performance per Dollar	25.8+37%	18.9
Release Date	2013	2015

Search Core i5-4670 on Amazon

Search Core i7-6822EQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.