
Core i5-4670

Core i7-4700HQ
Core i5-4670 vs Core i7-4700HQ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4670 vs Core i7-4700HQ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4670 vs Core i7-4700HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4670
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-4700HQ needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i7-4700HQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4700HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,491 vs 5,579).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Core i7-4700HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌78.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 47W.
Core i7-4700HQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 84W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4700HQ better than Core i5-4670?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4670 vs Core i7-4700HQ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670
The Core i5-4670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,491 points. Launch price was $360.

Core i7-4700HQ
The Core i7-4700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,579 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4670 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4700HQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700HQ — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-4670 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-4700HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670 scores 5,491 against the Core i7-4700HQ's 5,579 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-4700HQ. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700HQ.
| Feature | Core i5-4670 | Core i7-4700HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Crystalwell (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 5,491 | 5,579+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,169 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,279 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4670 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4700HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4670 | Core i7-4700HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670) / not specified (Core i7-4700HQ). The Core i5-4670 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-4700HQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670 targets Mid-Range Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-4670 | Core i7-4700HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mid-Range Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














