Core i5-4670 vs Xeon W-2104

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4670 vs Xeon W-2104 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4670 vs Xeon W-2104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4670

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 18.8 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Draws 84W instead of 120W, a 36W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,491 vs 5,530).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Xeon W-2104

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4670 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
❌42.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 84W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4670.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4670 better than Xeon W-2104?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2104 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4670 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2104 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 37.5% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4670 is the better buy right now. Core i5-4670 comes in $81 cheaper on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-2104 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 37.1% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 18.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013), 37.5% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4670 vs Xeon W-2104 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4670

The Core i5-4670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,491 points. Launch price was $360.

Xeon W-2104

The Xeon W-2104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,530 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-4670 and Xeon W-2104 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon W-2104 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-4670 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W-2104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4670 scores 5,491 against the Xeon W-2104's 5,530 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-2104. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670 vs 8.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2104.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Xeon W-2104
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	8.25 MB (total)+38%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	5,491	5,530
Geekbench 6 Single	1,169	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,279	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4670 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2104 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Xeon W-2104
Socket	LGA1150	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4670) / not specified (Xeon W-2104). The Core i5-4670 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon W-2104 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670 targets Mid-Range Desktop.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Xeon W-2104
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Mid-Range Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-4670 was priced at $213, while the Xeon W-2104 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($213 vs $294), Core i5-4670 was $81 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-4670 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 18.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2104 — making the Core i5-4670 the 31.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-4670	Xeon W-2104
MSRP	$213-28%	$294
Performance per Dollar	25.8+37%	18.8
Release Date	2013	2017

Search Core i5-4670 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2104 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.