
Core i5-7440HQ

FX-8320
Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7440HQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while FX-8320 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8320.
FX-8320
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-7440HQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,472 vs 5,490).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i5-7440HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7440HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-7440HQ better than FX-8320?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7440HQ
The Core i5-7440HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,490 points. Launch price was $250.

FX-8320
The FX-8320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,472 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7440HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8320 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8320 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-7440HQ versus 4 GHz on the FX-8320 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the FX-8320 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-7440HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8320 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7440HQ scores 5,490 against the FX-8320's 5,472 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-7440HQ. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,277 vs 458, a 94.4% lead for the Core i5-7440HQ that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Core i5-7440HQ | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-H (2017) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,490 | 5,472 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,277+179% | 458 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,791 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7440HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7440HQ versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-8320 — the Core i5-7440HQ supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7440HQ supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM175,QM175 (Core i5-7440HQ) and 970,990X,990FX (FX-8320).
| Feature | Core i5-7440HQ | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+29% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the FX-8320 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7440HQ) vs AMD-V (FX-8320). The Core i5-7440HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the FX-8320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7440HQ targets High Performance Laptop, FX-8320 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-7440HQ rivals Ryzen 5 2500U; FX-8320 rivals Core i5-3570.
| Feature | Core i5-7440HQ | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High Performance Laptop | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















