Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320

Intel

Core i5-7440HQ

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
VS
AMD

FX-8320

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7440HQ

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while FX-8320 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8320.

FX-8320

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +21.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-7440HQ.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,472 vs 5,490).
  • Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i5-7440HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7440HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7440HQ better than FX-8320?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-8320 is ahead with a 21.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7440HQ pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7440HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-7440HQ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-7440HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. FX-8320 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7440HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7440HQ vs FX-8320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-7440HQ

The Core i5-7440HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,490 points. Launch price was $250.

AMD

FX-8320

The FX-8320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,472 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-7440HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8320 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8320 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-7440HQ versus 4 GHz on the FX-8320 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the FX-8320 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-7440HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8320 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7440HQ scores 5,490 against the FX-8320's 5,472 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-7440HQ. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,277 vs 458, a 94.4% lead for the Core i5-7440HQ that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureCore i5-7440HQFX-8320
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
8192 kB+3100%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake-H (2017)
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
5,490
5,472
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,277+179%
458
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,791
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7440HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8320 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7440HQ versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-8320 — the Core i5-7440HQ supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7440HQ supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM175,QM175 (Core i5-7440HQ) and 970,990X,990FX (FX-8320).

FeatureCore i5-7440HQFX-8320
Socket
BGA1440
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+29%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8320 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7440HQ) vs AMD-V (FX-8320). The Core i5-7440HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the FX-8320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7440HQ targets High Performance Laptop, FX-8320 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-7440HQ rivals Ryzen 5 2500U; FX-8320 rivals Core i5-3570.

FeatureCore i5-7440HQFX-8320
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
High Performance Laptop
Productivity