Core i5-7440HQ vs Opteron 6376

Core i5-7440HQ vs Opteron 6376 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-7440HQ

4 / 4

5,490

0.0%

5,572

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7440HQ vs Opteron 6376 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7440HQ vs Opteron 6376: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7440HQ

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6376 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6376 across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,490 vs 5,572).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6376, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6376

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $703 MSRP, while Core i5-7440HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7440HQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6376 better than Core i5-7440HQ?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6376 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-7440HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6376 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.6% more average FPS across 20 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6376 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6376 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6376 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $703 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7440HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-7440HQ vs Opteron 6376 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7440HQ

The Core i5-7440HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,490 points. Launch price was $250.

Opteron 6376

The Opteron 6376 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,572 points. Launch price was $750.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7440HQ packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6376 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6376 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-7440HQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6376 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-7440HQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-7440HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6376 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7440HQ scores 5,490 against the Opteron 6376's 5,572 — a 1.5% lead for the Opteron 6376. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7440HQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6376.

Feature	Core i5-7440HQ	Opteron 6376
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+22%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+1500%	16 MB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake-H (2017)	Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark	5,490	5,572+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,277	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7440HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6376 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-7440HQ	Opteron 6376
Socket	BGA1440	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7440HQ) / not specified (Opteron 6376). The Core i5-7440HQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6376 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7440HQ targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7440HQ rivals Ryzen 5 2500U.