FX-8320
VS
Ryzen 3 2300U

FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 2300U

AMD

FX-8320

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 2300U

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8320 is positioned at rank 566 and the Ryzen 3 2300U is on rank 607, so the FX-8320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9627%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9096%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6605%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1990%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1576%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1379%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
790%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
779%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
710%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
710%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
702%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
683%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
673%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
670%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
664%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
100%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
99%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
99%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
99%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
99%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
99%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
99%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
98%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
98%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
97%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
97%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
97%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 2300U

#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#595
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
803%
#596
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
791%
#597
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
726%
#598
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
723%
#599
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
716%
#601
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
691%
#602
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
663%
#603
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
662%
#604
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
644%
#607
Ryzen 3 2300U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
100%
#622
Athlon II P320
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 2300U (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightFX-8320Ryzen 3 2300U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8320 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightFX-8320Ryzen 3 2300U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8320 and Ryzen 3 2300U

AMD

FX-8320

The FX-8320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,472 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 3 2300U

The Ryzen 3 2300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,484 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The FX-8320 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 2300U offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8320 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8320 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300U — a 16.2% clock advantage for the FX-8320 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The FX-8320 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2300U uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8320 scores 5,472 against the Ryzen 3 2300U's 5,484 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 2300U.

FeatureFX-8320Ryzen 3 2300U
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+18%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+75%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+1500%
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark
5,472
5,484
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,500
Geekbench 6 Single
458
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,791
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8320 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 2300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-8320Ryzen 3 2300U
Socket
AM3+
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (FX-8320) / not specified (Ryzen 3 2300U). Primary use case: FX-8320 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: FX-8320 rivals Core i5-3570.

FeatureFX-8320Ryzen 3 2300U
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Productivity