Xeon E5-1603 v3
VS
Core i5-3550S

Xeon E5-1603 v3 vs Core i5-3550S

Intel

Xeon E5-1603 v3

4 Cores4 Thrd140 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-3550S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1603 v3 is positioned at rank 683 and the Core i5-3550S is on rank 758, so the Xeon E5-1603 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1603 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12719%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2401%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2134%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1648%
#400
EPYC 7713P
MSRP: $5010|Avg: $2443
100%
#401
Xeon W-2145
MSRP: $1113|Avg: $145
99%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
99%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
98%
#405
Xeon 6737P
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $4995
98%
#406
Xeon Gold 6342
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $3000
97%
#407
Xeon Gold 6438N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
96%
#408
Xeon 6747P
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
96%
#683
Xeon E5-1603 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $40
100%
#684
Xeon E3-1270
MSRP: $330|Avg: $178
100%
#691
Xeon E5-1650 v2
MSRP: $583|Avg: $60
98%
#697
Xeon E3-1275 v2
MSRP: $426|Avg: $426
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3550S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14385%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13592%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9869%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2973%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2355%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2060%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1180%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1165%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1060%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1060%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1048%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1020%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1006%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1002%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
993%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
100%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
100%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
98%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
97%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
97%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
97%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($40) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1603 v3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-1603 v3Core i5-3550S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($40)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3550S ($100), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($60 less, 150% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-1603 v3Core i5-3550S
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+151%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Core i5-3550S

Intel

Xeon E5-1603 v3

The Xeon E5-1603 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,460 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-3550S

The Core i5-3550S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,442 points. Launch price was $350.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1603 v3 and Core i5-3550S share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1603 v3 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-3550S — a 27.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-3550S (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E5-1603 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-3550S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1603 v3 scores 4,460 against the Core i5-3550S's 4,442 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1603 v3. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1603 v3 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-3550S.

FeatureXeon E5-1603 v3Core i5-3550S
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz+32%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)+67%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,460
4,442
Geekbench 6 Single
619
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1603 v3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3550S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-1603 v3Core i5-3550S
Socket
LGA2011-3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1603 v3) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3550S). The Core i5-3550S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3550S targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-3550S rivals FX-6350.

FeatureXeon E5-1603 v3Core i5-3550S
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-1603 v3 launched at $273 MSRP, while the Core i5-3550S debuted at $205. At current prices ($40 vs $100), the Xeon E5-1603 v3 is $60 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1603 v3 delivers 111.5 pts/$ vs 44.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-3550S — making the Xeon E5-1603 v3 the 86% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1603 v3Core i5-3550S
MSRP
$273
$205-25%
Avg Price (30d)
$40-60%
$100
Performance per Dollar
111.5+151%
44.4
Release Date
2014
2012