Xeon E5-1607 v2 vs Core i5-6400T
Xeon E5-1607 v2
Core i5-6400T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is positioned at rank 676 and the Core i5-6400T is on rank 747, so the Xeon E5-1607 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1607 v2
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6400T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-6400T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($68) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-6400T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+74%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($68) | ✅ More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1607 v2 and Core i5-6400T
Xeon E5-1607 v2
The Xeon E5-1607 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $800.
Core i5-6400T
The Core i5-6400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,243 points. Launch price was $192.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E5-1607 v2 and Core i5-6400T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i5-6400T — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1607 v2 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-6400T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1607 v2 scores 4,141 against the Core i5-6400T's 4,243 — a 2.4% lead for the Core i5-6400T. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1607 v2 vs 6 MB on the Core i5-6400T.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-6400T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz+7% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+67% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 4,141 | 4,243+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 950 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-1607 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6400T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-6400T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1607 v2) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6400T). The Core i5-6400T includes integrated graphics (HD 530), while the Xeon E5-1607 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6400T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-6400T rivals Core i3-7100.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-6400T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD 530 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-1607 v2 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Core i5-6400T debuted at $192. At current prices ($68 vs $40), the Core i5-6400T is $28 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1607 v2 delivers 60.9 pts/$ vs 106.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-6400T — making the Core i5-6400T the 54.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1607 v2 | Core i5-6400T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $192-23% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $68 | $40-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.9 | 106.1+74% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-1607 v2 and Core i5-6400T
