Xeon E5-1607
VS
Opteron 3280

Xeon E5-1607 vs Opteron 3280

Intel

Xeon E5-1607

4 Cores4 Thrd130 WW2012
VS
AMD

Opteron 3280

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1607 is positioned at rank 638 and the Opteron 3280 is on rank 93, so the Opteron 3280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1607

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
10973%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2072%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1841%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1422%
#382
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A
99%
#383
EPYC 7551P
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $329
96%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
MSRP: $7349|Avg: $7999
96%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
95%
#638
Xeon E5-1607
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#640
Xeon W-2104
MSRP: $294|Avg: $309
99%
#643
Xeon E5-2620 v3
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
98%
#650
Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP: $350|Avg: $29
95%
#652
Xeon E5-1650 v3
MSRP: $583|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3280

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2197%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
415%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
369%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
285%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
92%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
89%
#93
Opteron 3280
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1607 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-1607Opteron 3280
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zurich (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 3280 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-1607Opteron 3280
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1607 and Opteron 3280

Intel

Xeon E5-1607

The Xeon E5-1607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 3,788 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Opteron 3280

The Opteron 3280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,783 points. Launch price was $229.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1607 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 3280 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 3280 has 4 more cores. The Opteron 3280 is built on the Zurich (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1607 scores 3,788 against the Opteron 3280's 3,783 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-1607. L3 cache: 10 MB on the Xeon E5-1607 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3280.

FeatureXeon E5-1607Opteron 3280
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+20%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
10 MB+25%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Zurich (2012)
PassMark
3,788
3,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1607 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 3280 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-1607Opteron 3280
Socket
LGA2011
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0