Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i7-6700T
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Core i7-6700T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is positioned at rank 577 and the Core i7-6700T is on rank 725, so the Xeon E5-1620 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620 v3
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6700T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-1620 v3 | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($189) | ✅ More affordable ($60) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-1620 v3 | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+217%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($189) | ✅ More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Core i7-6700T
Xeon E5-1620 v3
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,959 points. Launch price was $800.
Core i7-6700T
The Core i7-6700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,994 points. Launch price was $303.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Core i7-6700T share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-6700T — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6700T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 scores 6,959 against the Core i7-6700T's 6,994 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-6700T. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700T.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1620 v3 | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+25% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB (total)+25% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 6,959 | 6,994 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6700T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1620 v3 | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1620 v3) / not specified (Core i7-6700T). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1620 v3 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1620 v3 | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 launched at $294 MSRP, while the Core i7-6700T debuted at $303. At current prices ($189 vs $60), the Core i7-6700T is $129 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1620 v3 delivers 36.8 pts/$ vs 116.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-6700T — making the Core i7-6700T the 104% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1620 v3 | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294-3% | $303 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $189 | $60-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8 | 116.6+217% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-1620 v3 and Core i7-6700T
