Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3

Intel

Xeon E5-1650 v2

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4655 v3

6 Cores12 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1650 v2

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($583 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
  • Draws 130W instead of 135W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (9,306 vs 9,377).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).

Xeon E5-4655 v3

2015

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1650 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 6.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $623 MSRPvs$583 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1650 v2 better than Xeon E5-4655 v3?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-1650 v2 is ahead with a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4655 v3 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4655 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4655 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-1650 v2 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-1650 v2 comes in $40 cheaper on MSRP at $583 MSRP versus $623 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4655 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 6.1% better value on MSRP (16.0 vs 15.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-4655 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013), 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-1650 v2

The Xeon E5-1650 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,306 points. Launch price was $917.

Intel

Xeon E5-4655 v3

The Xeon E5-4655 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,377 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1650 v2 and Xeon E5-4655 v3 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1650 v2 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4655 v3 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1650 v2 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-1650 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-4655 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 scores 9,306 against the Xeon E5-4655 v3's 9,377 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-4655 v3. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1650 v2 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4655 v3.

FeatureXeon E5-1650 v2Xeon E5-4655 v3
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+22%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+21%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
9,306
9,377
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 5.0.

FeatureXeon E5-1650 v2Xeon E5-4655 v3
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-1650 v2 was priced at $583, while the Xeon E5-4655 v3 came in at $623. On launch pricing ($583 vs $623), Xeon E5-1650 v2 was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1650 v2 delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4655 v3 — making the Xeon E5-1650 v2 the 5.9% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1650 v2Xeon E5-4655 v3
MSRP
$583-6%
$623
Performance per Dollar
16.0+6%
15.1
Release Date
2013
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.