Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Xeon W-2225

Intel

Xeon E5-1650 v3

6 Cores12 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-2225

4 Cores8 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Xeon W-2225 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Xeon W-2225 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Xeon W-2225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1650 v3

2014

Why buy it

  • +81.8% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8.3 MB).
  • Costs $583 less on MSRP ($583 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
  • Delivers 99.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.8 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($583 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (10,387 vs 10,425).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.

Xeon W-2225

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 15 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2225 better than Xeon E5-1650 v3?
Yes. Xeon W-2225 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2225 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2225 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-2225 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-1650 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-2225 comes in 100.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,166 MSRP versus $583 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-1650 v3 is also 99.3% better value on MSRP (17.8 vs 8.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-2225 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs Xeon W-2225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-1650 v3

The Xeon E5-1650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 10,387 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon W-2225

The Xeon W-2225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 10,425 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1650 v3 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-2225 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-1650 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1650 v3 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-2225 — a 19% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2225 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-1650 v3 is built on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1650 v3 scores 10,387 against the Xeon W-2225's 10,425 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-2225. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon W-2225.

FeatureXeon E5-1650 v3Xeon W-2225
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz+21%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)+82%
8.25 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
10,387
10,425
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1650 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2225 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-1650 v3Xeon W-2225
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-1650 v3 was priced at $583, while the Xeon W-2225 came in at $1166. On launch pricing ($583 vs $1166), Xeon E5-1650 v3 was $583 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1650 v3 delivers 17.8 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2225 — making the Xeon E5-1650 v3 the 66.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1650 v3Xeon W-2225
MSRP
$583-50%
$1166
Performance per Dollar
17.8+100%
8.9
Release Date
2014
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.