Xeon E5-2407
VS
Core i5-760

Xeon E5-2407 vs Core i5-760

Intel

Xeon E5-2407

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-760

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2407 is positioned at rank 852 and the Core i5-760 is on rank 973, so the Xeon E5-2407 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2407

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19532%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3688%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3277%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2531%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
100%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
99%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
98%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
98%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
96%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
96%
#852
Xeon E5-2407
MSRP: $250|Avg: $25
100%
#857
Xeon 5120
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#859
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
98%
#861
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
97%
#862
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
97%
#863
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-760

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26872%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25391%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18436%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5554%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4399%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3849%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2204%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2176%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1981%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1981%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1959%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1906%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1879%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1871%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1854%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
100%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
100%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
98%
#976
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
96%
#977
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
96%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
95%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
95%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
95%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
94%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
94%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
93%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
92%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
91%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
91%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($25) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2407 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2407Core i5-760
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-760 ($61), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($36 less, 144% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2407Core i5-760
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+143%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2407 and Core i5-760

Intel

Xeon E5-2407

The Xeon E5-2407 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $335.

Intel

Core i5-760

The Core i5-760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 July 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,667 points. Launch price was $230.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2407 and Core i5-760 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i5-760 — a 40.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-760 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2407 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-760 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2407 scores 2,659 against the Core i5-760's 2,667 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-760. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-760.

FeatureXeon E5-2407Core i5-760
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
3.33 GHz+51%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+25%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
2,659
2,667
Geekbench 6 Single
470
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2407 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-760 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2407Core i5-760
Socket
LGA1356
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2407) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-760). Primary use case: Core i5-760 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-760 rivals Phenom II X4 970.

FeatureXeon E5-2407Core i5-760
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2407 launched at $250 MSRP, while the Core i5-760 debuted at $230. At current prices ($25 vs $61), the Xeon E5-2407 is $36 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2407 delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 43.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-760 — making the Xeon E5-2407 the 83.5% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2407Core i5-760
MSRP
$250
$230-8%
Avg Price (30d)
$25-59%
$61
Performance per Dollar
106.4+143%
43.7
Release Date
2012
2010