Xeon E5-2450 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2450 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2450 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2450

2012

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 135W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $694 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2637 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,460 vs 7,534).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 20 MB).
❌42.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2450 better than Xeon E5-2637 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2637 v4 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2450 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2450 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2450 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $694 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2637 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2637 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2450 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2450

The Xeon E5-2450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,534 points. Launch price was $500.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

The Xeon E5-2637 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,460 points. Launch price was $996.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2450 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2450 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2450 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v4 — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2637 v4 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-2450 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2450 scores 7,534 against the Xeon E5-2637 v4's 7,460 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2450. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2450 vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2637 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2450	Xeon E5-2637 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.7 GHz+28%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	20480 kB (total)+100%	10 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,534	7,460

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2450 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.