Xeon E5-2603 v3
VS
Core i3-4370

Xeon E5-2603 v3 vs Core i3-4370

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v3

6 Cores6 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i3-4370

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2603 v3 is positioned at rank 635 and the Core i3-4370 is on rank 664, so the Xeon E5-2603 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
10864%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2051%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1822%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1408%
#380
Xeon Gold 6526Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
99%
#382
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A
98%
#383
EPYC 7551P
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $329
95%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
MSRP: $7349|Avg: $7999
95%
#635
Xeon E5-2603 v3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#636
Xeon E5-2680 v2
MSRP: $667|Avg: $462
100%
#640
Xeon W-2104
MSRP: $294|Avg: $309
98%
#643
Xeon E5-2620 v3
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
97%
#650
Xeon E3-1275L v3
MSRP: $350|Avg: $29
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4370

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12049%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11385%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8267%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2490%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1973%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1726%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
988%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
975%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
888%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
888%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
878%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
855%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
843%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
839%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
832%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
99%
#664
Core i3-4370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $41
100%
#665
Core i5-7500T
MSRP: $202|Avg: $130
100%
#666
Core i5-7400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $78
100%
#667
Core i5-4670
MSRP: $213|Avg: $65
100%
#668
Core i5-4570S
MSRP: $195|Avg: $40
99%
#669
Pentium G2010
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#671
Core i5-6500TE
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
99%
#673
Celeron G550T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#674
Core i5-4430
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
99%
#675
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
99%
#677
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
99%
#678
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2603 v3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v3Core i3-4370
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($41)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-4370 ($41), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($41 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v3Core i3-4370
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($41)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2603 v3 and Core i3-4370

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v3

The Xeon E5-2603 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,825 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i3-4370

The Core i3-4370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,854 points. Launch price was $242.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2603 v3 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-4370 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2603 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v3 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-4370 — a 81.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-4370 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2603 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-4370 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2603 v3 scores 3,825 against the Core i3-4370's 3,854 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-4370. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603 v3 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4370.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v3Core i3-4370
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3.8 GHz+137%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.8 GHz+137%
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)+275%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,825
3,854
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,454
Geekbench 6 Single
904
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,071
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2603 v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4370 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v3Core i3-4370
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2603 v3) / true (Core i3-4370). The Core i3-4370 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E5-2603 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v3Core i3-4370
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4600
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true