Xeon E5-2603
VS
Core i3-6102E

Xeon E5-2603 vs Core i3-6102E

Intel

Xeon E5-2603

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-6102E

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2603 is positioned at rank 825 and the Core i3-6102E is on rank 989, so the Xeon E5-2603 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17870%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3374%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2998%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2316%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
99%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
98%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
98%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
97%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
95%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
94%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
93%
#825
Xeon E5-2603
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
99%
#837
Xeon W3550
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
95%
#839
Xeon E5-2450
MSRP: $694|Avg: $795
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6102E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29858%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
28213%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20485%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6171%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4276%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2449%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2417%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2201%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2201%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2176%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2117%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2088%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2079%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2061%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
98%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
100%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
98%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
98%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
98%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
98%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
97%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
96%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
94%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
93%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
91%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
90%
#1004
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2603 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2603Core i3-6102E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-6102E ($35), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($35 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2603Core i3-6102E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2603 and Core i3-6102E

Intel

Xeon E5-2603

The Xeon E5-2603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,325 points. Launch price was $207.

Intel

Core i3-6102E

The Core i3-6102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,349 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2603 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6102E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2603 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-6102E — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-6102E. The Xeon E5-2603 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6102E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2603 scores 2,325 against the Core i3-6102E's 2,349 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-6102E. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6102E.

FeatureXeon E5-2603Core i3-6102E
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
1.9 GHz+6%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+233%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,325
2,349+1%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2603) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6102E). The Core i3-6102E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon E5-2603 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-6102E targets Embedded.

FeatureXeon E5-2603Core i3-6102E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Embedded