Xeon E5-2608L V3
VS
Core i7-3770K

Xeon E5-2608L V3 vs Core i7-3770K

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L V3

6 Cores6 Thrd52 WWMax: 2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-3770K

4 Cores8 Thrd77 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2608L V3 is positioned at rank 450 and the Core i7-3770K is on rank 802, so the Xeon E5-2608L V3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2608L V3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
6478%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1223%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1087%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
840%
#290
Xeon Gold 5420+
MSRP: $1848|Avg: $1848
98%
#292
Xeon w7-2575X
MSRP: $1689|Avg: $1860
98%
#294
Xeon Gold 6444Y
MSRP: $3622|Avg: N/A
97%
#295
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
MSRP: $2649|Avg: $2782
97%
#450
Xeon E5-2608L V3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#451
Xeon D-1718T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $302
100%
#452
Xeon D-1622
MSRP: $195|Avg: $170
99%
#453
Xeon E3-1290 v2
MSRP: $885|Avg: $125
99%
#454
Xeon E5-2420 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $112
99%
#455
Xeon E3-1285 v6
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
99%
#456
Xeon E3-1268L v5
MSRP: $377|Avg: $93
99%
#460
Xeon E5-1428L V2
MSRP: $494|Avg: $83
98%
#461
Xeon E5-1428L
MSRP: $480|Avg: N/A
98%
#463
Xeon E5-2620 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $54
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3770K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15936%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15058%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10934%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3294%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2609%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2282%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1307%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1290%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1175%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1175%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1162%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1130%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1114%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1110%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1100%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
100%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
100%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
99%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
99%
#807
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
99%
#808
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#809
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
99%
#812
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
98%
#813
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
98%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
97%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
97%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2608L V3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2608L V3Core i7-3770K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($75)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3770K ($75), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($75 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2608L V3Core i7-3770K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($75)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2608L V3 and Core i7-3770K

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L V3

The Xeon E5-2608L V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 52 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,415 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i7-3770K

The Core i7-3770K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,495 points. Launch price was $294.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2608L V3 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i7-3770K offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L V3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L V3 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-3770K — a 64.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770K. The Xeon E5-2608L V3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3770K uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2608L V3 scores 6,415 against the Core i7-3770K's 6,495 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3770K. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2608L V3 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-3770K.

FeatureXeon E5-2608L V3Core i7-3770K
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.9 GHz+95%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)+88%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
6,415
6,495+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2608L V3 uses the LGA2011-3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3770K uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2608L V3Core i7-3770K
Socket
LGA2011-3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0