Xeon E5-2620 vs Core i7-4700MQ
Xeon E5-2620
Core i7-4700MQ
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2620 is positioned at rank 722 and the Core i7-4700MQ is on rank 1000, so the Xeon E5-2620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2620
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700MQ
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2620 | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($89) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2620 | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+79%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($89) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2620 and Core i7-4700MQ
Xeon E5-2620
The Xeon E5-2620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,328 points. Launch price was $36.
Core i7-4700MQ
The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2620 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-4700MQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ — a 30.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4700MQ (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-2620 uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2620 scores 5,328 against the Core i7-4700MQ's 5,349 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-4700MQ. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4700MQ.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2620 | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+36% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 15360 kB (total)+150% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,328 | 5,349 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2620 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2620 | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 384 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2620 launched at $360 MSRP, while the Core i7-4700MQ debuted at $383. At current prices ($89 vs $50), the Core i7-4700MQ is $39 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2620 delivers 59.9 pts/$ vs 107.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700MQ — making the Core i7-4700MQ the 56.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2620 | Core i7-4700MQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $360-6% | $383 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $89 | $50-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.9 | 107.0+79% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2620 and Core i7-4700MQ
