Xeon E5-2620 vs Xeon E5-2630L

Intel

Xeon E5-2620

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2630L

6 Cores12 Thrd60 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-2620 vs Xeon E5-2630L Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2620 vs Xeon E5-2630L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2620 vs Xeon E5-2630L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2620

2012

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $360 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2630L mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 58.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 60W.

Xeon E5-2630L

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 60W instead of 95W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,305 vs 5,328).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2620 better than Xeon E5-2630L?
Yes. Xeon E5-2620 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-2620 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $360 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2620 vs Xeon E5-2630L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-2620

The Xeon E5-2620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,328 points. Launch price was $36.

Intel

Xeon E5-2630L

The Xeon E5-2630L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,305 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon E5-2630L share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630L — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2620 scores 5,328 against the Xeon E5-2630L's 5,305 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2620. Both processors carry 15360 kB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon E5-2620Xeon E5-2630L
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
L3 Cache
15360 kB (total)
15360 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
5,328
5,305
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 2.0.

FeatureXeon E5-2620Xeon E5-2630L
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
384 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40