MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E5-2620

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E5-2620 Performance Spectrum

MediaTek Kompanio 838

8 / 8

5,343

+0.3%

Core i5-6200U

Athlon X4 950

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Core i7-3632QM

Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2620

6 / 12

5,328

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E5-2620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E5-2620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2620

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 838 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,328 vs 5,343).
❌Launch MSRP is still $360 MSRP, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is MediaTek Kompanio 838 better than Xeon E5-2620?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2620 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, MediaTek Kompanio 838 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2620 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. MediaTek Kompanio 838 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $360 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2620 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 838 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E5-2620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MediaTek Kompanio 838

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2620

The Xeon E5-2620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,328 points. Launch price was $36.

⚡

Processing Power

The MediaTek Kompanio 838 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2620 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture, while the Xeon E5-2620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the MediaTek Kompanio 838 scores 5,343 against the Xeon E5-2620's 5,328 — a 0.3% lead for the MediaTek Kompanio 838.

Feature	MediaTek Kompanio 838	Xeon E5-2620
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	15360 kB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	—	32 nm
Architecture	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	5,343	5,328