MediaTek Kompanio 838 vs Xeon E5-2620
MediaTek Kompanio 838
Xeon E5-2620
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is positioned at rank 103 and the Xeon E5-2620 is on rank 722, so the MediaTek Kompanio 838 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar MediaTek Kompanio 838
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2620
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | MediaTek Kompanio 838 | Xeon E5-2620 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($89) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) / Standard Node) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | MediaTek Kompanio 838 | Xeon E5-2620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($89) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Xeon E5-2620
MediaTek Kompanio 838
The MediaTek Kompanio 838 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 31 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,343 points. Launch price was $149.
Xeon E5-2620
The Xeon E5-2620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,328 points. Launch price was $36.
Processing Power
The MediaTek Kompanio 838 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 838 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 838 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2620 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The MediaTek Kompanio 838 uses the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture, while the Xeon E5-2620 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the MediaTek Kompanio 838 scores 5,343 against the Xeon E5-2620's 5,328 — a 0.3% lead for the MediaTek Kompanio 838.
| Feature | MediaTek Kompanio 838 | Xeon E5-2620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 15360 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | — | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 5,343 | 5,328 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on MediaTek Kompanio 838 and Xeon E5-2620
